Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance in the Geriatric Population

  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of the Review

Our national guidelines regarding screening and surveillance for colorectal cancer recommend individualized discussions with patients 75–85 years of age. This review explores the complex decision-making that surrounds these discussions.

Recent Findings

Despite updated guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance, the guidance for patients 75 years of age or older remains unchanged. Studies exploring the risks to colonoscopy in this population, patient preferences, life expectancy calculators and additional studies in the subpopulation of inflammatory bowel disease patients provide points of consideration to aid in individualized discussions.

Summary

The benefit-risk discussion for colorectal cancer screening in patients over 75 years old warrants further guidance to develop best practice. To craft more comprehensive recommendations, additional research with inclusion of such patients is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, Fedewa SA, Butterly LF, Anderson JC, Cercek A, Smith RA, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 May;70(3):145–164. doi: 10.3322/caac.21601. Epub 2020 Mar 5. PMID: 32133645.

  2. Millan M, Merino S, Caro A, Feliu F, Escuder J, Francesch T. Treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015 Oct 15;7(10):204 – 20. doi: https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v7.i10.204. PMID: 26483875.

  3. U.S. Census Bureau. (2021). American Community Survey 1-year Estimates Data Profile. Retrieved from https://data.census.gov/table?q=DP05&tid=ACSDP1Y2021.DP05.

  4. U.S. Census Bureau. (2017). Table 3: Detailed age and sex composition of the population. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2017/demo/popproj/2017-summary-tables.html.

  5. Lieberman DA, Williams JL, Holub JL, Morris CD, Logan JR, Eisen GM, Carney P. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Jul;80(1):133–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Feb 22. PMID: 24565067. Colonoscopy utilization and outcomes 2000 to 2011.

  6. ; US Preventive Services Task Force, Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM, Cabana M, Caughey AB, Davis EM, Donahue KE, Doubeni CA, Krist AH, Kubik M, Li L, Ogedegbe G, Owens DK, Pbert L, Silverstein M, Stevermer J, Tseng CW, Wong JB. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1965–1977. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6238. Erratum in: JAMA. 2021 Aug 24;326(8):773. PMID: 34003218.

  7. Shaukat A, Kahi CJ, Burke CA, Rabeneck L, Sauer BG, Rex DK. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Colorectal Cancer Screening 2021. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Mar 1;116(3):458–479. doi: https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001122. PMID: 33657038.

  8. Krigel A, Prasad VK, Lebwohl B. News Coverage of the American Cancer Society’s Update to Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Mar;95(3):617–618. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.12.016. PMID: 32138893.

  9. Strul H, Kariv R, Leshno M, Halak A, Jakubowicz M, Santo M, Umansky M, Shirin H, Degani Y, Revivo M, Halpern Z, Arber N. The prevalence rate and anatomic location of colorectal adenoma and cancer detected by colonoscopy in average-risk individuals aged 40–80 years. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;101(2):255 – 62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00430.x. PMID: 16454827.

  10. ** Calderwood AH, Holub JL, Greenwald DA, Robertson DJ. Yield and Practice Patterns of Surveillance Colonoscopy Among Older Adults: An Analysis of the GI Quality Improvement Consortium. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov;114(11):1811–1819. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000430. PMID: 31658125. Study that uses a large national registry to highlight the yield of surveillance versus diagnostic or screening colonoscopies, focusing on adults aged 75 years or above.

  11. Lin OS, Kozarek RA, Schembre DB, Ayub K, Gluck M, Drennan F, Soon MS, Rabeneck L. Screening colonoscopy in very elderly patients: prevalence of neoplasia and estimated impact on life expectancy. JAMA. 2006 May 24;295(20):2357-65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.20.2357. PMID: 16720821.

  12. Ko CW, Sonnenberg A. Comparing risks and benefits of colorectal cancer screening in elderly patients. Gastroenterology. 2005 Oct;129(4):1163-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2005.07.027. PMID: 16230070.

  13. Ho SB, Hovsepians R, Gupta S. Optimal Bowel Cleansing for Colonoscopy in the Elderly Patient. Drugs Aging. 2017 Mar;34(3):163–172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-017-0436-z. PMID: 28214970.

  14. Lin OS. Performing colonoscopy in elderly and very elderly patients: Risks, costs and benefits. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Jun 16;6(6):220-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v6.i6.220. PMID: 24932373.

  15. Kothari ST, Huang RJ, Shaukat A, Agrawal D, Buxbaum JL, Abbas Fehmi SM, Fishman DS, Gurudu SR, Khashab MA, Jamil LH, Jue TL, Law JK, Lee JK, Naveed M, Qumseya BJ, Sawhney MS, Thosani N, Yang J, DeWitt JM, Wani S. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee Chair. ASGE review of adverse events in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Dec;90(6):863–876e33. Epub 2019 Sep 25. PMID: 31563271.

  16. Lin JS, Piper MA, Perdue LA, Rutter C, Webber EM, O’Connor E, Smith N, Whitlock EP. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jun. Report No.: 14-05203-EF-1. PMID: 27441328.

  17. Day LW, Walter LC, Velayos F. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in the elderly patient. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;106(7):1197 – 206;quiz 1207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2011.128. Epub 2011 Apr 26. PMID: 21519362.

  18. Day LW, Kwon A, Inadomi JM, Walter LC, Somsouk M. Adverse events in older patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Oct;74(4):885 – 96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.023. PMID: 21951478.

  19. **Causada-Calo N, Bishay K, Albashir S, Al Mazroui A, Armstrong D. Association Between Age and Complications After Outpatient Colonoscopy. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208958. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8958. PMID: 32584409. Cohort study focusing on patients over 75 years old to assess association with post-colonoscopy complications, finding that age 75 years old and above was associated with higher post-colonoscopy complications.

  20. Staheli B, Rondeau B. Anesthetic Considerations In The Geriatric Population. [Updated 2022 Jun 5]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK572137/.

  21. Kotwal AA, Walter LC. Cancer Screening in Older Adults: Individualized Decision-Making and Communication Strategies. Med Clin North Am. 2020 Nov;104(6):989–1006. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Sep 16. PMID: 33099456.

  22. Lee SJ, Boscardin WJ, Stijacic-Cenzer I, Conell-Price J, O’Brien S, Walter LC. Time lag to benefit after screening for breast and colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of survival data from the United States, Sweden, United Kingdom, and Denmark. BMJ. 2013 Jan 8;346:e8441. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e8441. PMID: 23299842.

  23. National Vital Statistics Reports. United States Life Tables., 2020. DOI: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr71/nvsr71-02.pdf.

  24. ePrognosis. Calculators. https://eprognosis.ucsf.edu/calculators/.

  25. *Cenin DR, Tinmouth J, Naber SK, Dubé C, McCurdy BR, Paszat L, Rabeneck L, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. Calculation of Stop Ages for Colorectal Cancer Screening Based on Comorbidities and Screening History. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Mar;19(3):547–555. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.05.038. Epub 2020 May 23. PMID: 32450362. Using the MISCAN-Colon model, the benefits and harms of continued screening by sex, comorbidities and screening history was estimated to determine optimal ages of screening cessation.

  26. Kirchgatterer A, Steiner P, Hubner D, Fritz E, Aschl G, Preisinger J, Hinterreiter M, Stadler B, Knoflach P. Colorectal cancer in geriatric patients: endoscopic diagnosis and surgical treatment. World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jan 21;11(3):315-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i3.315. PMID: 15637734.

  27. Piper MS, Maratt JK, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Lewis C, Forman J, Vijan S, Metko V, Saini SD. Patient Attitudes Toward Individualized Recommendations to Stop Low-Value Colorectal Cancer Screening. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e185461. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5461. PMID: 30646275.

  28. Wintjens DSJ, Bogie RMM, van den Heuvel TRA, le Clercq CMC, Oostenbrug LE, Romberg-Camps MJL, Straathof JW, Stassen LPS, Masclee AAM, Jonkers DMAE, Sanduleanu-Dascalescu S, Pierik MJ. Incidence and Classification of Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancers in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Dutch Population-Based Cohort Study. J Crohns Colitis. 2018 Jun 28;12(7):777–783. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy044. PMID: 29648663.

  29. Sasson AN, Sheehan G, Yu A, Gupta A, Ling K, Kochar B, Ananthakrishnan AN. Yield and predictors of Surveillance Colonoscopies in older adults with Long-standing Ulcerative Colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jun;20(6):e1353–64. Epub 2021 Aug 21. PMID: 34425278.

  30. Ten Hove JR, Shah SC, Shaffer SR, Bernstein CN, Castaneda D, Palmela C, Mooiweer E, Elman J, Kumar A, Glass J, Axelrad J, Ullman TA, Colombel JF, Torres J, van Bodegraven AA, Hoentjen F, Jansen JM, de Jong ME, Mahmmod N, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, Ponsioen CY, van der Woude CJ, Itzkowitz SH, Oldenburg B. Consecutive negative findings on colonoscopy during surveillance predict a low risk of advanced neoplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease with long-standing colitis: results of a 15-year multicentre, multinational cohort study. Gut. 2019 Apr;68(4):615–22. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315440. Epub 2018 May 2. PMID: 29720408.

  31. Faye AS, Colombel JF, Aging. and IBD: A New Challenge for Clinicians and Researchers. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2022 Jan 5;28(1):126–132. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izab039. PMID: 33904578.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aasma Shaukat.

Ethics declarations

No conflict of interest or relevant disclosures for any of the authors. Funding support from the Steve and Alex Cohen Foundation (A.S.)

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheong, J., Faye, A. & Shaukat, A. Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance in the Geriatric Population. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 25, 141–145 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-023-00875-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-023-00875-8

Keywords

Navigation